MARKING+CRITERIA

Type in the content of your new page here. Questions 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Outcomes assessed: H1.1, H1.2, H2.1, H3.4, H4.1, H4.2 MARKING GUIDELINES Criteria Marks • • • ||||  Addresses the question asked with a sophisticated and sustained argument, which demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the issue(s) raised in the question Presents a logical, coherent and well-structured response drawing on a clear identification of relevant key features of the period Supports interpretation with detailed, relevant and accurate historical information and makes use of appropriate terms and concepts ||  21–25 || • • •  ||||  Addresses the question asked with a sound attempt at an argument, which demonstrates a well-developed understanding of the issue(s) raised in the question Presents a logical and well-structured response drawing on relevant key features of the period Provides detailed, relevant and accurate historical information and makes use of appropriate terms and concepts ||  16–20 || • • •  ||||  Addresses the question asked with a relevant but largely narrative or descriptive response which may contain implied understanding of the issue(s) raised in the question Presents a generally well-structured response, with some identification of the key features of the period Provides adequate relevant and accurate historical information incorporating some historical terms ||  11–15 || • • •  ||||  Presents a narrative or descriptive response, which is largely relevant but may be generalised and/or incomplete Presents a structured but simple response, with some mention of relevant key features of the period Provides limited accurate historical information incorporating some historical terms ||  6–10 || • • •  ||||  Attempts a narrative or description which may be only generally relevant and/or seriously incomplete May be disjointed and/or very brief Provides very limited historical information ||  1–5 ||
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * <span style="font-family: CFDGL C+ Times,Times">